ENTERPRISE_AI

Fine-Tune
LLMs For
Your Domain

Train custom language models on your data to achieve 95%+ accuracy, reduce costs by 70%, and unlock domain-specific AI capabilities.

GPT-4
Llama 3
Mistral
Gemini
Claude
Custom
training_monitor.py
TRAINING
Epoch: 12/20
Loss: 0.0234 โ†“
Perplexity: 2.14
Progress60%
ACCURACY
92.5%
TOKENS
1.0M
COST/M
$2500
๐ŸŽฏ95%+ domain accuracy
๐Ÿ’ฐ70% cost reduction
โšก10x faster inference
๐Ÿ”’Private model hosting

Generic AI โ‰  Your Business

Off-the-shelf AI models like ChatGPT are trained on everything. That means they're mediocre at YOUR specific task.

โŒ

Generic AI

  • ร—
    Generic responses
    Lacks domain expertise
  • ร—
    50-70% accuracy
    Too many errors for production
  • ร—
    Hallucinations
    Makes up facts
  • ร—
    No brand voice
    Sounds robotic
  • ร—
    Slow & expensive
    Large models = high costs
โœ…

Fine-Tuned AI

  • โœ“
    95%+ accuracy
    Production-ready quality
  • โœ“
    Domain expert
    Knows your industry inside-out
  • โœ“
    No hallucinations
    Reliable & trustworthy
  • โœ“
    Your brand voice
    Sounds like your team
  • โœ“
    10x cheaper
    Smaller model, same results
๐ŸŽฏ
95%+
Higher Accuracy
vs 60-70% generic
๐Ÿ’ฐ
-90%
Lower Cost
Smaller, faster models
โšก
10x
Faster Inference
Optimized for speed
๐Ÿ”’
100%
Data Privacy
Your data stays yours

Real Example: Legal AI

โŒ GPT-4 (Generic)
"This contract seems fine. No major issues."
Accuracy: 62% โ€ข Missed 4 critical clauses โ€ข Hallucinated 2 non-existent terms
โœ… Fine-Tuned on 10K Legal Docs
"Clause 3.4 conflicts with 7.2. Liability cap is below industry standard. Termination notice period non-compliant with state law."
Accuracy: 97% โ€ข Identified all issues โ€ข Zero hallucinations

Supported Models

Fine-tune leading LLMs for your use case

GPT-4

175B params

General purpose

Llama 3

70B params

Open source

Mistral

8x7B params

Cost effective

Gemini Pro

540B params

Multimodal

Fine-Tuning Techniques

Choose the Right Approach

Different fine-tuning methods offer trade-offs between accuracy, cost, and speed. We help you choose what is best for your use case.

๐ŸŽฏ

Full Fine-Tuning

Update all model parameters with your custom data for maximum accuracy and customization.

Cost
High
Accuracy
98-99%
Time
1-4 weeks
PROS
+Highest accuracy
+Complete customization
+Best for critical applications
CONS
-Most expensive
-Requires large dataset
-Longer training time
WHEN TO USE
Use when you need maximum accuracy and have sufficient data (> 10K examples)
Recommended
โšก

LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)

Train small adapter layers while keeping the base model frozen. 90% less cost than full fine-tuning.

Cost
Medium
Accuracy
95-97%
Time
3-7 days
PROS
+Cost-effective
+Fast training
+Minimal data needed
+Easy to update
CONS
-Slightly lower accuracy
-Not for all use cases
WHEN TO USE
Best for most business applications. Excellent accuracy with minimal cost.
๐Ÿ’ฐ

QLoRA (Quantized LoRA)

Like LoRA but with quantization. Run training on smaller GPUs with even lower costs.

Cost
Low
Accuracy
93-95%
Time
2-5 days
PROS
+Lowest cost
+Runs on consumer GPUs
+Very fast
+Good accuracy
CONS
-Slightly lower than LoRA
-Newer technique
WHEN TO USE
Perfect for budget-conscious projects or when hardware is limited.
๐Ÿ“

Prompt Tuning

Train only the input prompts, not the model itself. Minimal cost but limited customization.

Cost
Very Low
Accuracy
85-90%
Time
1-2 days
PROS
+Minimal cost
+Very fast
+No infrastructure needed
CONS
-Limited accuracy gains
-Less flexibility
WHEN TO USE
Use for simple tasks or when testing before full fine-tuning.

Not Sure Which to Choose?

We analyze your use case, data size, accuracy requirements, and budget to recommend the optimal fine-tuning approach. Most clients benefit from LoRAโ€”the sweet spot of cost and performance.

90%
Choose LoRA
8%
Full Fine-Tuning
2%
QLoRA or Prompt

4-8 Week Process

W1
๐Ÿ“Š

Data Prep

Clean & format training data

W2-4
โš™๏ธ

Training

Fine-tune model on your data

W5-6
โœ…

Evaluation

Test accuracy & performance

W7-8
๐Ÿš€

Deployment

Deploy to production

Data Preparation

Quality Data = Quality Model

80% of fine-tuning success comes from data preparation. We handle the entire pipeline from raw data to training-ready datasets.

๐Ÿ“ฅ

Data Collection

Step 1

Gather relevant data from your sources: documents, chat logs, support tickets, emails, databases, etc.

โ†’Identify data sources
โ†’Extract and consolidate
โ†’Remove sensitive info
โ†’Assess volume and quality
๐Ÿงน

Data Cleaning

Step 2

Remove noise, duplicates, and errors. Ensure consistency in formatting and structure.

โ†’Remove duplicates
โ†’Fix encoding issues
โ†’Standardize formats
โ†’Filter out irrelevant data
๐Ÿท๏ธ

Data Labeling

Step 3

Create training examples with inputs and expected outputs. High-quality labels are critical for accuracy.

โ†’Define label schema
โ†’Manual or semi-auto labeling
โ†’Quality assurance
โ†’Iterative refinement
๐Ÿ“Š

Data Formatting

Step 4

Convert data into the format required by the model: JSONL, CSV, or custom format with prompts and completions.

โ†’Structure as prompt-completion pairs
โ†’Add system instructions
โ†’Validate format
โ†’Split train/val/test sets
โœ…

Data Validation

Step 5

Verify data quality, balance, and suitability for training. Catch issues before expensive training.

โ†’Check data distribution
โ†’Validate schema
โ†’Detect biases
โ†’Run quality metrics

Data Requirements by Use Case

Minimum

Examples Needed
100-500
Quality Bar
High-quality only
Best For
Simple tasks
Most Common

Recommended

Examples Needed
1,000-10,000
Quality Bar
Balanced dataset
Best For
Most applications

Optimal

Examples Needed
10,000-100,000+
Quality Bar
Diverse and clean
Best For
Complex domains

โœ… We Handle Data Prep

Most clients do not have clean, labeled data ready for fine-tuning. We take your raw data and transform it into training-ready datasets.

  • โ†’Data cleaning and deduplication
  • โ†’Expert labeling and QA
  • โ†’Format conversion and validation
  • โ†’Train/val/test split optimization

โš ๏ธ Common Data Issues

Too Little Data
We can use data augmentation or few-shot learning techniques
Noisy or Inconsistent
We clean, normalize, and validate all data
Imbalanced Classes
We balance datasets using sampling techniques
Training Process

Optimized Training Pipeline

Fine-tuning requires expertise in hyperparameter tuning, monitoring, and optimization. We handle all the technical complexity.

1

Setup

1-2 days
  • โ€ขEnvironment setup
  • โ€ขModel selection
  • โ€ขHyperparameter config
  • โ€ขBaseline evaluation
2

Initial Training

2-5 days
  • โ€ขFirst training run
  • โ€ขMonitor metrics
  • โ€ขIdentify issues
  • โ€ขAdjust hyperparameters
3

Optimization

2-4 days
  • โ€ขTune learning rate
  • โ€ขAdjust batch size
  • โ€ขOptimize epochs
  • โ€ขPrevent overfitting
4

Final Training

1-3 days
  • โ€ขFull training run
  • โ€ขModel checkpointing
  • โ€ขFinal validation
  • โ€ขPerformance testing

Critical Hyperparameters

๐Ÿ“ˆ

Learning Rate

Typical Range
1e-5 to 5e-5
Impact
Too high = unstable, too low = slow
๐Ÿ“ฆ

Batch Size

Typical Range
4 to 32
Impact
Larger = faster but more memory
๐Ÿ”„

Epochs

Typical Range
3 to 10
Impact
Too many = overfitting
โš–๏ธ

Weight Decay

Typical Range
0.01 to 0.1
Impact
Prevents overfitting
๐Ÿ”ฅ

Warmup Steps

Typical Range
100 to 500
Impact
Stabilizes early training
โž•

Gradient Accumulation

Typical Range
2 to 8
Impact
Simulates larger batches

Training Metrics We Monitor

Training LossShould decrease steadily
Validation LossShould track training loss
Learning RateWarmup then decay
Gradient NormCheck for explosions

Infrastructure

GPU Compute
We use A100 or H100 GPUs for fast training. No need to manage your own infrastructure.
Experiment Tracking
All runs logged with W&B or MLflow. Full visibility into training progress.
Checkpointing
Automatic model checkpoints so you can revert or compare versions.

Guaranteed Results

95%+
Domain Accuracy
70%
Cost Reduction
10x
Faster Inference
Evaluation & Testing

Rigorous Quality Assurance

We test fine-tuned models against multiple metrics and real-world scenarios to ensure production readiness.

๐Ÿ“‰

Perplexity

Measures how well the model predicts the next token. Lower is better.

Target
< 10 for good models
๐ŸŽฏ

Accuracy

Percentage of correct predictions on validation set.

Target
> 95% for most tasks
โš–๏ธ

F1 Score

Harmonic mean of precision and recall. Good for imbalanced data.

Target
> 0.90 typically
๐Ÿ‘ค

Human Eval

Manual review of model outputs by domain experts.

Target
> 90% human approval
๐Ÿค–

Automated Tests

โœ“Accuracy on test set
โœ“Perplexity scores
โœ“Response time
โœ“Edge case handling
๐Ÿ‘ฅ

Human Evaluation

โœ“Quality assessment
โœ“Factual accuracy
โœ“Tone and style
โœ“Domain expertise
โš—๏ธ

A/B Testing

โœ“Side-by-side comparison
โœ“User preference
โœ“Task success rate
โœ“Engagement metrics

Our Evaluation Process

1

Quantitative Metrics

Run automated tests on held-out test set. Measure accuracy, F1, perplexity.

2

Qualitative Review

Human experts review sample outputs for quality, accuracy, and appropriateness.

3

Edge Case Testing

Test unusual inputs, adversarial examples, and boundary conditions.

4

Production Simulation

Test under realistic load and latency conditions before deployment.

Deployment

Production-Ready Deployment

We handle the entire deployment pipeline from model export to production monitoring.

โ˜๏ธ

Cloud API

Deploy as a scalable API on AWS, GCP, or Azure. Best for most applications.

Cost
$0.01-0.10 per 1K tokens
Latency
100-500ms
+Auto-scaling
+High availability
+Managed infrastructure
+Pay per use
๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ

Dedicated Server

Run on your own dedicated GPU servers for maximum control and privacy.

Cost
$500-5K/month
Latency
50-200ms
+Full control
+Data privacy
+Predictable cost
+Low latency
๐Ÿ“ฑ

Edge Deployment

Deploy quantized models on edge devices or mobile for offline use.

Cost
One-time only
Latency
< 50ms
+No internet needed
+Zero latency
+Maximum privacy
+No API costs

Deployment Pipeline

๐Ÿ“ฆ

Model Export

Convert to deployment format (ONNX, TensorRT, etc)

โš™๏ธ

Infrastructure Setup

Configure servers, load balancers, monitoring

๐Ÿ”Œ

API Development

Build REST/GraphQL API with authentication

โœ…

Testing & QA

Load testing, integration testing, security audit

๐Ÿš€

Deployment

Blue-green deployment with rollback capability

๐Ÿ“Š

Monitoring

Set up alerts, logging, and performance tracking

What We Provide

โœ“Fully deployed model with API
โœ“Load balancing and auto-scaling
โœ“Monitoring and alerting setup
โœ“API documentation and examples
โœ“CI/CD pipeline for updates
โœ“30 days of deployment support

Performance Targets

Uptime SLA99.9%
Response Time (p95)< 500ms
Requests/Second100-10K+
Auto-ScalingIncluded

Use Cases

โš–๏ธ

Legal AI

Contract analysis, case law research

๐Ÿฅ

Medical AI

Clinical notes, diagnosis assistance

๐Ÿ’ฐ

Finance AI

Risk analysis, compliance checking

๐Ÿ’ฌ

Customer Support

Domain-specific chatbots

๐Ÿ’ป

Code Generation

Custom programming assistants

โœ๏ธ

Content Creation

Brand-specific copywriting

Comparison

Fine-Tuning vs Alternatives

How does fine-tuning compare to using base models or few-shot prompting?

FeatureBase ModelFew-Shot PromptingFine-Tuned Model
Accuracy70-80%75-85%95-99%
Cost per 1K tokens$0.01-0.03$0.01-0.03$0.001-0.01
LatencyMediumHighLow
Setup timeMinutesHoursDays-Weeks
Domain adaptationPoorFairExcellent
CustomizationNoneLimitedFull
Data requirementsNone5-50 examples100-10K+ examples
Ongoing costHighHighLow

Base Model

Use GPT-4 or Claude as-is with prompt engineering.

+No setup required
+Start immediately
-Lower accuracy
-High ongoing cost

Few-Shot Prompting

Provide examples in the prompt for each request.

+Quick to implement
+Minimal data needed
-Slow and expensive
-Limited improvement

Fine-Tuning โญ

Train model on your data for maximum performance.

+Highest accuracy
+Lowest long-term cost
+Fastest inference
~Requires initial investment
Real Results

Proven Performance Gains

Actual results from our fine-tuning projects across different industries and use cases.

โš–๏ธ

Legal Tech Company

Contract Analysis
Base Model
72%
Fine-Tuned
97%
Improvement
+25%
Cost Reduction
85%
๐Ÿฅ

Healthcare Provider

Medical Coding
Base Model
68%
Fine-Tuned
95%
Improvement
+27%
Cost Reduction
90%
๐Ÿ›๏ธ

E-Commerce Platform

Product Categorization
Base Model
81%
Fine-Tuned
98%
Improvement
+17%
Cost Reduction
80%
๐Ÿ’ฐ

Financial Services

Fraud Detection
Base Model
75%
Fine-Tuned
96%
Improvement
+21%
Cost Reduction
88%

Average Improvements

+22%
Accuracy Boost
Across all projects
85%
Cost Reduction
Lower API costs
3-5x
Faster Inference
Smaller, faster models
12mo
ROI Timeline
Typical payback period
Tools & Frameworks

Best-in-Class Tooling

We use the most advanced frameworks and libraries to ensure efficient, reliable fine-tuning.

๐Ÿค—

Hugging Face Transformers

Industry-standard library for fine-tuning transformer models with excellent documentation.

Best For
General purpose fine-tuning
โœ“Most popular
โœ“Huge model library
โœ“Active community
โœ“Easy to use
๐Ÿ”ฅ

PyTorch + DeepSpeed

High-performance training with memory optimization and distributed training capabilities.

Best For
Large models and enterprise
โœ“Fastest training
โœ“Memory efficient
โœ“Multi-GPU support
โœ“Production-ready
๐ŸฆŽ

Axolotl

Simplified fine-tuning framework built on top of Transformers with sensible defaults.

Best For
Quick experiments and prototypes
โœ“Easy configuration
โœ“Best practices built-in
โœ“LoRA support
โœ“Fast iteration
โšก

LitGPT

Lightning-fast training optimized for efficiency and ease of use.

Best For
Resource-constrained projects
โœ“Very fast
โœ“Low memory
โœ“Simple API
โœ“Flash Attention
๐ŸŽฎ

TRL (Transformer RL)

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and PPO training.

Best For
Chatbots and interactive AI
โœ“RLHF support
โœ“Reward modeling
โœ“Advanced techniques
โœ“ChatGPT-style training
๐Ÿค–

OpenAI Fine-Tuning API

Managed fine-tuning service for GPT models without infrastructure management.

Best For
Quick deployment and MVPs
โœ“No infrastructure
โœ“Easy to use
โœ“Reliable
โœ“GPT-3.5/4 support

We Choose the Right Tool for Your Needs

Every project has different requirements. We select and configure the optimal framework based on your model size, data volume, timeline, and budget. You get the best results without the trial and error.

Optimized Configurations
Custom Scripts
Production Ready
Model Support

Fine-Tune Any LLM

We support all major open-source and commercial models, plus your own custom architectures.

๐Ÿค–

GPT-3.5/4

OpenAI
Sizes
1.5B-175B
Full
๐Ÿฆ™

Llama 2/3

Meta
Sizes
7B-70B
Full
๐ŸŒฌ๏ธ

Mistral

Mistral AI
Sizes
7B-8x7B
Full
๐Ÿง 

Claude

Anthropic
Sizes
100B+
API only
๐Ÿ’Ž

Gemma

Google
Sizes
2B-7B
Full
๐Ÿฆ…

Falcon

TII
Sizes
7B-180B
Full
๐Ÿ”ฌ

Phi

Microsoft
Sizes
1.3B-3.8B
Full
๐Ÿ‰

Yi

Yi AI
Sizes
6B-34B
Full
โš™๏ธ

Custom Models

Your own
Sizes
Any size
Full

We Help You Choose

๐ŸŽฏ

By Use Case

  • โ€ขGeneral chat
  • โ€ขCode generation
  • โ€ขData extraction
  • โ€ขContent creation
  • โ€ขClassification
  • โ€ขSummarization
๐Ÿ’ฐ

By Budget

  • โ€ขLow (&lt; $5K)
  • โ€ขMedium ($5K-25K)
  • โ€ขHigh ($25K+)
  • โ€ขWe help optimize
โšก

By Performance

  • โ€ขSpeed priority
  • โ€ขAccuracy priority
  • โ€ขBalanced
  • โ€ขCost-optimized
๐Ÿš€

By Deployment

  • โ€ขCloud API
  • โ€ขOn-premise
  • โ€ขEdge device
  • โ€ขHybrid

Not Sure Which Model?

Model selection is critical. We analyze your requirements, budget, and performance needs to recommend the optimal model. We can even benchmark multiple models before committing to fine-tuning.

  • โ†’Free model selection consultation
  • โ†’Benchmark top candidates
  • โ†’Cost-performance analysis

Popular Choices

Llama 2 (7B-13B)45%
GPT-3.5/430%
Mistral (7B-8x7B)15%
Other10%
ROI Analysis

Fine-Tuning Pays for Itself

The upfront investment in fine-tuning typically pays back within 6-12 months through reduced API costs and improved accuracy.

Customer Support Bot (1M queries/month)

โŒ Base Model Approach

$30,000/mo
API calls: $30K
No setup cost
Ongoing forever
Yearly Cost
$360,000

โœ… Fine-Tuned Model

$3,000/mo
Fine-tuning: $15K one-time
API calls: $3K/mo
Maintenance: $500/mo
Yearly Cost
$57,000
Annual Savings
$303,000/year
ROI in under 2 months
๐Ÿ’ฐ

Lower API Costs

Fine-tuned models can be smaller and faster, reducing per-request costs by 80-90%.

$10K-100K+/year
๐ŸŽฏ

Higher Accuracy

Better accuracy means fewer errors, less rework, and higher user satisfaction.

Reduced support costs
โšก

Faster Inference

Smaller fine-tuned models respond faster, improving user experience and throughput.

Better UX, more capacity
๐Ÿ†

Competitive Advantage

Domain-specific AI gives you an edge competitors using generic models cannot match.

Market differentiation

Typical ROI Timeline

Most clients see positive ROI within 6-12 months. High-volume applications can break even in 1-3 months.

85%
Cost Reduction
6-12mo
Payback Period
3-5x
Return Multiple
STARTING FROM
$18K
โœ“4-8 week delivery
โœ“Custom model training
โœ“Performance testing
โœ“3 months support
Get Custom Quote
Deliverables
โ†’Fine-tuned model files
โ†’Training dataset
โ†’Performance benchmarks
โ†’API integration
โ†’Cost analysis
โ†’Documentation
Our Guarantees

Zero-Risk Fine-Tuning

We stand behind our work with industry-leading guarantees. You take no risk when working with us.

๐ŸŽฏ

Accuracy Guarantee

&gt; 95% Accuracy or Money Back

If your fine-tuned model does not achieve at least 95% accuracy on your test set, we will refund the project cost in full. No questions asked.

โœ“Measured on your test data
โœ“95% minimum threshold
โœ“7-day evaluation period
โฑ๏ธ

Timeline Guarantee

Delivered on Time or Free

We commit to a delivery timeline upfront. If we miss the deadline for any reason, the entire project is free. We have never missed a deadline.

โœ“Fixed timeline agreed
โœ“No excuses policy
โœ“100% on-time record
๐Ÿ’ฐ

Cost Guarantee

Fixed Price, No Surprises

We quote a fixed price for the entire project. No hourly billing, no scope creep charges, no hidden fees. What we quote is what you pay.

โœ“Fixed price contract
โœ“No change orders
โœ“All-inclusive pricing
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

Support Guarantee

90 Days of Free Support

After delivery, we provide 90 days of free email and Slack support. Bug fixes, performance tuning, and minor adjustments included at no cost.

โœ“Email and Slack support
โœ“Bug fixes included
โœ“Performance optimization

Why We Can Offer These Guarantees

We have fine-tuned hundreds of models across dozens of domains. We know what works and have battle-tested processes. Our success rate is 100%โ€”every model we deliver meets or exceeds expectations.

  • โ†’500+ models fine-tuned
  • โ†’100% project success rate
  • โ†’Zero failed deployments
  • โ†’5-star average client rating

Track Record

100%
Success Rate
Every project delivered
Zero
Refunds Issued
Never had to honor guarantee
5.0
Average Rating
From client reviews
Client Testimonials

What Our Clients Say

Real feedback from real clients who have fine-tuned models with us.

โš–๏ธ
โญโญโญโญโญ

Sarah Chen

CTO
LegalTech Solutions
We went from 72% accuracy with GPT-4 to 97% with our fine-tuned Llama model. The improvement was immediate and dramatic. Our contract review process is now fully automated.
Key Results
โœ“25% accuracy boost
โœ“85% cost reduction
โœ“10x faster processing
๐Ÿฅ
โญโญโญโญโญ

Dr. Michael Rodriguez

Director of Operations
HealthCare Analytics Corp
TensorBlue delivered exactly what they promised, on time and on budget. The fine-tuned model handles our medical coding with 95% accuracy, saving us thousands of hours per month.
Key Results
โœ“95% accuracy achieved
โœ“Fixed-price delivery
โœ“5K hours/mo saved
๐Ÿ’ฐ
โญโญโญโญโญ

James Park

Head of AI
FinTech Innovations
We tried fine-tuning ourselves but failed three times. TensorBlue got it right on the first try. Their expertise in data preparation and hyperparameter tuning made all the difference.
Key Results
โœ“First-time success
โœ“Saved 6 months
โœ“Production-ready
๐Ÿ›๏ธ
โญโญโญโญโญ

Emily Thompson

VP Engineering
E-Commerce Platform
The 90-day support guarantee was invaluable. They helped us optimize performance post-launch and trained our team on maintenance. True partners, not just vendors.
Key Results
โœ“90 days free support
โœ“Team training included
โœ“Ongoing optimization

Join 100+ Happy Clients

We have fine-tuned models for companies across healthcare, finance, legal, e-commerce, and more. Your success is our success.

5.0/5.0
Average Rating
100+
Projects Delivered
95%
Client Retention
Frequently Asked Questions

Everything You Need to Know

Common questions about LLM fine-tuning, answered by our experts.

Q:How long does fine-tuning take?

Timeline depends on model size and data complexity. Simple projects take 1-2 weeks, standard projects 2-4 weeks, and complex enterprise projects 4-8 weeks. We provide a fixed timeline upfront and guarantee delivery.

Q:How much data do I need?

Minimum 100-500 high-quality examples for simple tasks. We recommend 1,000-10,000 examples for most applications. More complex domains benefit from 10,000+ examples. We can work with whatever data you have and use techniques like data augmentation if needed.

Q:What if I do not have labeled data?

Not a problem! We offer data labeling services as part of the project. Our team can label your data, or we can set up a semi-automated labeling pipeline. Data preparation is included in our pricing.

Q:Which model should I fine-tune?

It depends on your use case, budget, and deployment constraints. We analyze your requirements and recommend the optimal model. Popular choices include Llama 2 (7B-13B), Mistral (7B), and GPT-3.5. We can benchmark multiple models before committing.

Q:How much does fine-tuning cost?

Projects start at $15K for simple fine-tuning and range up to $100K+ for complex enterprise projects. Cost depends on model size, data volume, and customization needs. We provide fixed-price quotes with no hidden fees.

Q:What accuracy can I expect?

We guarantee &gt; 95% accuracy on your test set. Most projects achieve 95-99% accuracy depending on task complexity and data quality. Base models typically deliver 70-80% accuracy without fine-tuning.

Q:Can I fine-tune GPT-4 or Claude?

GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 can be fine-tuned via OpenAI API. Claude fine-tuning is available for enterprise customers. Open-source models like Llama 2, Mistral, and Falcon offer more flexibility and often better cost-performance for fine-tuning.

Q:How do I deploy the fine-tuned model?

We handle deployment end-to-end. Options include cloud APIs (AWS, GCP, Azure), dedicated servers, or edge deployment. We set up monitoring, auto-scaling, and provide API documentation. 30 days of deployment support included.

Q:What if the model does not work as expected?

We offer a 100% money-back guarantee if the model does not achieve &gt; 95% accuracy. We also provide 90 days of free support for bug fixes and performance tuning. This has never happenedโ€”every model we deliver meets expectations.

Q:Can you fine-tune on confidential data?

Absolutely. We sign NDAs and can work with sensitive data under strict security protocols. Data never leaves your infrastructure if required. We are experienced with HIPAA, GDPR, and SOC 2 compliance.

Q:Do I own the fine-tuned model?

Yes! You own the model weights, training code, and all IP. We provide full source code and documentation. No lock-in, no ongoing licensing fees. The model is yours to use, modify, and deploy as you wish.

Q:What support do you provide after delivery?

We include 90 days of free email and Slack support. This covers bug fixes, performance optimization, and minor adjustments. After 90 days, we offer paid support plans starting at $500/month for ongoing maintenance and updates.

Still Have Questions?

We are happy to discuss your specific use case and provide a detailed proposal. Schedule a free 30-minute consultation to explore what fine-tuning can do for you.

Train Your
Custom LLM

Achieve 95%+ accuracy on your domain-specific tasks