ENTERPRISE_AI

Fine-Tune
LLMs For
Your Domain

Train custom language models on your data to achieve 95%+ accuracy, reduce costs by 70%, and unlock domain-specific AI capabilities.

GPT-4
Llama 3
Mistral
Gemini
Claude
Custom
training_monitor.py
TRAINING
Epoch: 12/20
Loss: 0.0234 ↓
Perplexity: 2.14
Progress60%
ACCURACY
92.5%
TOKENS
1.0M
COST/M
$2500
🎯95%+ domain accuracy
💰70% cost reduction
10x faster inference
🔒Private model hosting

Generic AI ≠ Your Business

Off-the-shelf AI models like ChatGPT are trained on everything. That means they're mediocre at YOUR specific task.

Generic AI

  • ×
    Generic responses
    Lacks domain expertise
  • ×
    50-70% accuracy
    Too many errors for production
  • ×
    Hallucinations
    Makes up facts
  • ×
    No brand voice
    Sounds robotic
  • ×
    Slow & expensive
    Large models = high costs

Fine-Tuned AI

  • 95%+ accuracy
    Production-ready quality
  • Domain expert
    Knows your industry inside-out
  • No hallucinations
    Reliable & trustworthy
  • Your brand voice
    Sounds like your team
  • 10x cheaper
    Smaller model, same results
🎯
95%+
Higher Accuracy
vs 60-70% generic
💰
-90%
Lower Cost
Smaller, faster models
10x
Faster Inference
Optimized for speed
🔒
100%
Data Privacy
Your data stays yours

Real Example: Legal AI

❌ GPT-4 (Generic)
"This contract seems fine. No major issues."
Accuracy: 62% • Missed 4 critical clauses • Hallucinated 2 non-existent terms
✅ Fine-Tuned on 10K Legal Docs
"Clause 3.4 conflicts with 7.2. Liability cap is below industry standard. Termination notice period non-compliant with state law."
Accuracy: 97% • Identified all issues • Zero hallucinations

Supported Models

Fine-tune leading LLMs for your use case

GPT-4

175B params

General purpose

Llama 3

70B params

Open source

Mistral

8x7B params

Cost effective

Gemini Pro

540B params

Multimodal

Fine-Tuning Techniques

Choose the Right Approach

Different fine-tuning methods offer trade-offs between accuracy, cost, and speed. We help you choose what is best for your use case.

🎯

Full Fine-Tuning

Update all model parameters with your custom data for maximum accuracy and customization.

Cost
High
Accuracy
98-99%
Time
1-4 weeks
PROS
+Highest accuracy
+Complete customization
+Best for critical applications
CONS
-Most expensive
-Requires large dataset
-Longer training time
WHEN TO USE
Use when you need maximum accuracy and have sufficient data (> 10K examples)
Recommended

LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)

Train small adapter layers while keeping the base model frozen. 90% less cost than full fine-tuning.

Cost
Medium
Accuracy
95-97%
Time
3-7 days
PROS
+Cost-effective
+Fast training
+Minimal data needed
+Easy to update
CONS
-Slightly lower accuracy
-Not for all use cases
WHEN TO USE
Best for most business applications. Excellent accuracy with minimal cost.
💰

QLoRA (Quantized LoRA)

Like LoRA but with quantization. Run training on smaller GPUs with even lower costs.

Cost
Low
Accuracy
93-95%
Time
2-5 days
PROS
+Lowest cost
+Runs on consumer GPUs
+Very fast
+Good accuracy
CONS
-Slightly lower than LoRA
-Newer technique
WHEN TO USE
Perfect for budget-conscious projects or when hardware is limited.
📝

Prompt Tuning

Train only the input prompts, not the model itself. Minimal cost but limited customization.

Cost
Very Low
Accuracy
85-90%
Time
1-2 days
PROS
+Minimal cost
+Very fast
+No infrastructure needed
CONS
-Limited accuracy gains
-Less flexibility
WHEN TO USE
Use for simple tasks or when testing before full fine-tuning.

Not Sure Which to Choose?

We analyze your use case, data size, accuracy requirements, and budget to recommend the optimal fine-tuning approach. Most clients benefit from LoRA—the sweet spot of cost and performance.

90%
Choose LoRA
8%
Full Fine-Tuning
2%
QLoRA or Prompt

4-8 Week Process

W1
📊

Data Prep

Clean & format training data

W2-4
⚙️

Training

Fine-tune model on your data

W5-6

Evaluation

Test accuracy & performance

W7-8
🚀

Deployment

Deploy to production

Data Preparation

Quality Data = Quality Model

80% of fine-tuning success comes from data preparation. We handle the entire pipeline from raw data to training-ready datasets.

📥

Data Collection

Step 1

Gather relevant data from your sources: documents, chat logs, support tickets, emails, databases, etc.

Identify data sources
Extract and consolidate
Remove sensitive info
Assess volume and quality
🧹

Data Cleaning

Step 2

Remove noise, duplicates, and errors. Ensure consistency in formatting and structure.

Remove duplicates
Fix encoding issues
Standardize formats
Filter out irrelevant data
🏷️

Data Labeling

Step 3

Create training examples with inputs and expected outputs. High-quality labels are critical for accuracy.

Define label schema
Manual or semi-auto labeling
Quality assurance
Iterative refinement
📊

Data Formatting

Step 4

Convert data into the format required by the model: JSONL, CSV, or custom format with prompts and completions.

Structure as prompt-completion pairs
Add system instructions
Validate format
Split train/val/test sets

Data Validation

Step 5

Verify data quality, balance, and suitability for training. Catch issues before expensive training.

Check data distribution
Validate schema
Detect biases
Run quality metrics

Data Requirements by Use Case

Minimum

Examples Needed
100-500
Quality Bar
High-quality only
Best For
Simple tasks
Most Common

Recommended

Examples Needed
1,000-10,000
Quality Bar
Balanced dataset
Best For
Most applications

Optimal

Examples Needed
10,000-100,000+
Quality Bar
Diverse and clean
Best For
Complex domains

We Handle Data Prep

Most clients do not have clean, labeled data ready for fine-tuning. We take your raw data and transform it into training-ready datasets.

  • Data cleaning and deduplication
  • Expert labeling and QA
  • Format conversion and validation
  • Train/val/test split optimization

⚠️ Common Data Issues

Too Little Data
We can use data augmentation or few-shot learning techniques
Noisy or Inconsistent
We clean, normalize, and validate all data
Imbalanced Classes
We balance datasets using sampling techniques
Training Process

Optimized Training Pipeline

Fine-tuning requires expertise in hyperparameter tuning, monitoring, and optimization. We handle all the technical complexity.

1

Setup

1-2 days
  • Environment setup
  • Model selection
  • Hyperparameter config
  • Baseline evaluation
2

Initial Training

2-5 days
  • First training run
  • Monitor metrics
  • Identify issues
  • Adjust hyperparameters
3

Optimization

2-4 days
  • Tune learning rate
  • Adjust batch size
  • Optimize epochs
  • Prevent overfitting
4

Final Training

1-3 days
  • Full training run
  • Model checkpointing
  • Final validation
  • Performance testing

Critical Hyperparameters

📈

Learning Rate

Typical Range
1e-5 to 5e-5
Impact
Too high = unstable, too low = slow
📦

Batch Size

Typical Range
4 to 32
Impact
Larger = faster but more memory
🔄

Epochs

Typical Range
3 to 10
Impact
Too many = overfitting
⚖️

Weight Decay

Typical Range
0.01 to 0.1
Impact
Prevents overfitting
🔥

Warmup Steps

Typical Range
100 to 500
Impact
Stabilizes early training

Gradient Accumulation

Typical Range
2 to 8
Impact
Simulates larger batches

Training Metrics We Monitor

Training LossShould decrease steadily
Validation LossShould track training loss
Learning RateWarmup then decay
Gradient NormCheck for explosions

Infrastructure

GPU Compute
We use A100 or H100 GPUs for fast training. No need to manage your own infrastructure.
Experiment Tracking
All runs logged with W&B or MLflow. Full visibility into training progress.
Checkpointing
Automatic model checkpoints so you can revert or compare versions.

Guaranteed Results

95%+
Domain Accuracy
70%
Cost Reduction
10x
Faster Inference
Evaluation & Testing

Rigorous Quality Assurance

We test fine-tuned models against multiple metrics and real-world scenarios to ensure production readiness.

📉

Perplexity

Measures how well the model predicts the next token. Lower is better.

Target
< 10 for good models
🎯

Accuracy

Percentage of correct predictions on validation set.

Target
> 95% for most tasks
⚖️

F1 Score

Harmonic mean of precision and recall. Good for imbalanced data.

Target
> 0.90 typically
👤

Human Eval

Manual review of model outputs by domain experts.

Target
> 90% human approval
🤖

Automated Tests

Accuracy on test set
Perplexity scores
Response time
Edge case handling
👥

Human Evaluation

Quality assessment
Factual accuracy
Tone and style
Domain expertise
⚗️

A/B Testing

Side-by-side comparison
User preference
Task success rate
Engagement metrics

Our Evaluation Process

1

Quantitative Metrics

Run automated tests on held-out test set. Measure accuracy, F1, perplexity.

2

Qualitative Review

Human experts review sample outputs for quality, accuracy, and appropriateness.

3

Edge Case Testing

Test unusual inputs, adversarial examples, and boundary conditions.

4

Production Simulation

Test under realistic load and latency conditions before deployment.

Deployment

Production-Ready Deployment

We handle the entire deployment pipeline from model export to production monitoring.

☁️

Cloud API

Deploy as a scalable API on AWS, GCP, or Azure. Best for most applications.

Cost
$0.01-0.10 per 1K tokens
Latency
100-500ms
+Auto-scaling
+High availability
+Managed infrastructure
+Pay per use
🖥️

Dedicated Server

Run on your own dedicated GPU servers for maximum control and privacy.

Cost
$500-5K/month
Latency
50-200ms
+Full control
+Data privacy
+Predictable cost
+Low latency
📱

Edge Deployment

Deploy quantized models on edge devices or mobile for offline use.

Cost
One-time only
Latency
< 50ms
+No internet needed
+Zero latency
+Maximum privacy
+No API costs

Deployment Pipeline

📦

Model Export

Convert to deployment format (ONNX, TensorRT, etc)

⚙️

Infrastructure Setup

Configure servers, load balancers, monitoring

🔌

API Development

Build REST/GraphQL API with authentication

Testing & QA

Load testing, integration testing, security audit

🚀

Deployment

Blue-green deployment with rollback capability

📊

Monitoring

Set up alerts, logging, and performance tracking

What We Provide

Fully deployed model with API
Load balancing and auto-scaling
Monitoring and alerting setup
API documentation and examples
CI/CD pipeline for updates
30 days of deployment support

Performance Targets

Uptime SLA99.9%
Response Time (p95)< 500ms
Requests/Second100-10K+
Auto-ScalingIncluded

Use Cases

⚖️

Legal AI

Contract analysis, case law research

🏥

Medical AI

Clinical notes, diagnosis assistance

💰

Finance AI

Risk analysis, compliance checking

💬

Customer Support

Domain-specific chatbots

💻

Code Generation

Custom programming assistants

✍️

Content Creation

Brand-specific copywriting

Comparison

Fine-Tuning vs Alternatives

How does fine-tuning compare to using base models or few-shot prompting?

FeatureBase ModelFew-Shot PromptingFine-Tuned Model
Accuracy70-80%75-85%95-99%
Cost per 1K tokens$0.01-0.03$0.01-0.03$0.001-0.01
LatencyMediumHighLow
Setup timeMinutesHoursDays-Weeks
Domain adaptationPoorFairExcellent
CustomizationNoneLimitedFull
Data requirementsNone5-50 examples100-10K+ examples
Ongoing costHighHighLow

Base Model

Use GPT-4 or Claude as-is with prompt engineering.

+No setup required
+Start immediately
-Lower accuracy
-High ongoing cost

Few-Shot Prompting

Provide examples in the prompt for each request.

+Quick to implement
+Minimal data needed
-Slow and expensive
-Limited improvement

Fine-Tuning ⭐

Train model on your data for maximum performance.

+Highest accuracy
+Lowest long-term cost
+Fastest inference
~Requires initial investment
Real Results

Proven Performance Gains

Actual results from our fine-tuning projects across different industries and use cases.

⚖️

Legal Tech Company

Contract Analysis
Base Model
72%
Fine-Tuned
97%
Improvement
+25%
Cost Reduction
85%
🏥

Healthcare Provider

Medical Coding
Base Model
68%
Fine-Tuned
95%
Improvement
+27%
Cost Reduction
90%
🛍️

E-Commerce Platform

Product Categorization
Base Model
81%
Fine-Tuned
98%
Improvement
+17%
Cost Reduction
80%
💰

Financial Services

Fraud Detection
Base Model
75%
Fine-Tuned
96%
Improvement
+21%
Cost Reduction
88%

Average Improvements

+22%
Accuracy Boost
Across all projects
85%
Cost Reduction
Lower API costs
3-5x
Faster Inference
Smaller, faster models
12mo
ROI Timeline
Typical payback period
Tools & Frameworks

Best-in-Class Tooling

We use the most advanced frameworks and libraries to ensure efficient, reliable fine-tuning.

🤗

Hugging Face Transformers

Industry-standard library for fine-tuning transformer models with excellent documentation.

Best For
General purpose fine-tuning
Most popular
Huge model library
Active community
Easy to use
🔥

PyTorch + DeepSpeed

High-performance training with memory optimization and distributed training capabilities.

Best For
Large models and enterprise
Fastest training
Memory efficient
Multi-GPU support
Production-ready
🦎

Axolotl

Simplified fine-tuning framework built on top of Transformers with sensible defaults.

Best For
Quick experiments and prototypes
Easy configuration
Best practices built-in
LoRA support
Fast iteration

LitGPT

Lightning-fast training optimized for efficiency and ease of use.

Best For
Resource-constrained projects
Very fast
Low memory
Simple API
Flash Attention
🎮

TRL (Transformer RL)

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and PPO training.

Best For
Chatbots and interactive AI
RLHF support
Reward modeling
Advanced techniques
ChatGPT-style training
🤖

OpenAI Fine-Tuning API

Managed fine-tuning service for GPT models without infrastructure management.

Best For
Quick deployment and MVPs
No infrastructure
Easy to use
Reliable
GPT-3.5/4 support

We Choose the Right Tool for Your Needs

Every project has different requirements. We select and configure the optimal framework based on your model size, data volume, timeline, and budget. You get the best results without the trial and error.

Optimized Configurations
Custom Scripts
Production Ready
Model Support

Fine-Tune Any LLM

We support all major open-source and commercial models, plus your own custom architectures.

🤖

GPT-3.5/4

OpenAI
Sizes
1.5B-175B
Full
🦙

Llama 2/3

Meta
Sizes
7B-70B
Full
🌬️

Mistral

Mistral AI
Sizes
7B-8x7B
Full
🧠

Claude

Anthropic
Sizes
100B+
API only
💎

Gemma

Google
Sizes
2B-7B
Full
🦅

Falcon

TII
Sizes
7B-180B
Full
🔬

Phi

Microsoft
Sizes
1.3B-3.8B
Full
🐉

Yi

Yi AI
Sizes
6B-34B
Full
⚙️

Custom Models

Your own
Sizes
Any size
Full

We Help You Choose

🎯

By Use Case

  • General chat
  • Code generation
  • Data extraction
  • Content creation
  • Classification
  • Summarization
💰

By Budget

  • Low (&lt; $5K)
  • Medium ($5K-25K)
  • High ($25K+)
  • We help optimize

By Performance

  • Speed priority
  • Accuracy priority
  • Balanced
  • Cost-optimized
🚀

By Deployment

  • Cloud API
  • On-premise
  • Edge device
  • Hybrid

Not Sure Which Model?

Model selection is critical. We analyze your requirements, budget, and performance needs to recommend the optimal model. We can even benchmark multiple models before committing to fine-tuning.

  • Free model selection consultation
  • Benchmark top candidates
  • Cost-performance analysis

Popular Choices

Llama 2 (7B-13B)45%
GPT-3.5/430%
Mistral (7B-8x7B)15%
Other10%
ROI Analysis

Fine-Tuning Pays for Itself

The upfront investment in fine-tuning typically pays back within 6-12 months through reduced API costs and improved accuracy.

Customer Support Bot (1M queries/month)

Base Model Approach

$30,000/mo
API calls: $30K
No setup cost
Ongoing forever
Yearly Cost
$360,000

Fine-Tuned Model

$3,000/mo
Fine-tuning: $15K one-time
API calls: $3K/mo
Maintenance: $500/mo
Yearly Cost
$57,000
Annual Savings
$303,000/year
ROI in under 2 months
💰

Lower API Costs

Fine-tuned models can be smaller and faster, reducing per-request costs by 80-90%.

$10K-100K+/year
🎯

Higher Accuracy

Better accuracy means fewer errors, less rework, and higher user satisfaction.

Reduced support costs

Faster Inference

Smaller fine-tuned models respond faster, improving user experience and throughput.

Better UX, more capacity
🏆

Competitive Advantage

Domain-specific AI gives you an edge competitors using generic models cannot match.

Market differentiation

Typical ROI Timeline

Most clients see positive ROI within 6-12 months. High-volume applications can break even in 1-3 months.

85%
Cost Reduction
6-12mo
Payback Period
3-5x
Return Multiple
STARTING FROM
$18K
4-8 week delivery
Custom model training
Performance testing
3 months support
Get Custom Quote
Deliverables
Fine-tuned model files
Training dataset
Performance benchmarks
API integration
Cost analysis
Documentation
Our Guarantees

Zero-Risk Fine-Tuning

We stand behind our work with industry-leading guarantees. You take no risk when working with us.

🎯

Accuracy Guarantee

&gt; 95% Accuracy or Money Back

If your fine-tuned model does not achieve at least 95% accuracy on your test set, we will refund the project cost in full. No questions asked.

Measured on your test data
95% minimum threshold
7-day evaluation period
⏱️

Timeline Guarantee

Delivered on Time or Free

We commit to a delivery timeline upfront. If we miss the deadline for any reason, the entire project is free. We have never missed a deadline.

Fixed timeline agreed
No excuses policy
100% on-time record
💰

Cost Guarantee

Fixed Price, No Surprises

We quote a fixed price for the entire project. No hourly billing, no scope creep charges, no hidden fees. What we quote is what you pay.

Fixed price contract
No change orders
All-inclusive pricing
🛡️

Support Guarantee

90 Days of Free Support

After delivery, we provide 90 days of free email and Slack support. Bug fixes, performance tuning, and minor adjustments included at no cost.

Email and Slack support
Bug fixes included
Performance optimization

Why We Can Offer These Guarantees

We have fine-tuned hundreds of models across dozens of domains. We know what works and have battle-tested processes. Our success rate is 100%—every model we deliver meets or exceeds expectations.

  • 500+ models fine-tuned
  • 100% project success rate
  • Zero failed deployments
  • 5-star average client rating

Track Record

100%
Success Rate
Every project delivered
Zero
Refunds Issued
Never had to honor guarantee
5.0
Average Rating
From client reviews
Client Testimonials

What Our Clients Say

Real feedback from real clients who have fine-tuned models with us.

⚖️

Sarah Chen

CTO
LegalTech Solutions
We went from 72% accuracy with GPT-4 to 97% with our fine-tuned Llama model. The improvement was immediate and dramatic. Our contract review process is now fully automated.
Key Results
25% accuracy boost
85% cost reduction
10x faster processing
🏥

Dr. Michael Rodriguez

Director of Operations
HealthCare Analytics Corp
TensorBlue delivered exactly what they promised, on time and on budget. The fine-tuned model handles our medical coding with 95% accuracy, saving us thousands of hours per month.
Key Results
95% accuracy achieved
Fixed-price delivery
5K hours/mo saved
💰

James Park

Head of AI
FinTech Innovations
We tried fine-tuning ourselves but failed three times. TensorBlue got it right on the first try. Their expertise in data preparation and hyperparameter tuning made all the difference.
Key Results
First-time success
Saved 6 months
Production-ready
🛍️

Emily Thompson

VP Engineering
E-Commerce Platform
The 90-day support guarantee was invaluable. They helped us optimize performance post-launch and trained our team on maintenance. True partners, not just vendors.
Key Results
90 days free support
Team training included
Ongoing optimization

Join 100+ Happy Clients

We have fine-tuned models for companies across healthcare, finance, legal, e-commerce, and more. Your success is our success.

5.0/5.0
Average Rating
100+
Projects Delivered
95%
Client Retention
Frequently Asked Questions

Everything You Need to Know

Common questions about LLM fine-tuning, answered by our experts.

Q:How long does fine-tuning take?

Timeline depends on model size and data complexity. Simple projects take 1-2 weeks, standard projects 2-4 weeks, and complex enterprise projects 4-8 weeks. We provide a fixed timeline upfront and guarantee delivery.

Q:How much data do I need?

Minimum 100-500 high-quality examples for simple tasks. We recommend 1,000-10,000 examples for most applications. More complex domains benefit from 10,000+ examples. We can work with whatever data you have and use techniques like data augmentation if needed.

Q:What if I do not have labeled data?

Not a problem! We offer data labeling services as part of the project. Our team can label your data, or we can set up a semi-automated labeling pipeline. Data preparation is included in our pricing.

Q:Which model should I fine-tune?

It depends on your use case, budget, and deployment constraints. We analyze your requirements and recommend the optimal model. Popular choices include Llama 2 (7B-13B), Mistral (7B), and GPT-3.5. We can benchmark multiple models before committing.

Q:How much does fine-tuning cost?

Projects start at $15K for simple fine-tuning and range up to $100K+ for complex enterprise projects. Cost depends on model size, data volume, and customization needs. We provide fixed-price quotes with no hidden fees.

Q:What accuracy can I expect?

We guarantee &gt; 95% accuracy on your test set. Most projects achieve 95-99% accuracy depending on task complexity and data quality. Base models typically deliver 70-80% accuracy without fine-tuning.

Q:Can I fine-tune GPT-4 or Claude?

GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 can be fine-tuned via OpenAI API. Claude fine-tuning is available for enterprise customers. Open-source models like Llama 2, Mistral, and Falcon offer more flexibility and often better cost-performance for fine-tuning.

Q:How do I deploy the fine-tuned model?

We handle deployment end-to-end. Options include cloud APIs (AWS, GCP, Azure), dedicated servers, or edge deployment. We set up monitoring, auto-scaling, and provide API documentation. 30 days of deployment support included.

Q:What if the model does not work as expected?

We offer a 100% money-back guarantee if the model does not achieve &gt; 95% accuracy. We also provide 90 days of free support for bug fixes and performance tuning. This has never happened—every model we deliver meets expectations.

Q:Can you fine-tune on confidential data?

Absolutely. We sign NDAs and can work with sensitive data under strict security protocols. Data never leaves your infrastructure if required. We are experienced with HIPAA, GDPR, and SOC 2 compliance.

Q:Do I own the fine-tuned model?

Yes! You own the model weights, training code, and all IP. We provide full source code and documentation. No lock-in, no ongoing licensing fees. The model is yours to use, modify, and deploy as you wish.

Q:What support do you provide after delivery?

We include 90 days of free email and Slack support. This covers bug fixes, performance optimization, and minor adjustments. After 90 days, we offer paid support plans starting at $500/month for ongoing maintenance and updates.

Still Have Questions?

We are happy to discuss your specific use case and provide a detailed proposal. Schedule a free 30-minute consultation to explore what fine-tuning can do for you.

Train Your
Custom LLM

Achieve 95%+ accuracy on your domain-specific tasks